Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 3766 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 80 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 12% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Xeon E5620 - 306 vs 272 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 24 vs 8 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
306
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.63/FPS
100%
Price, £
£499
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18275 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |