Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Xeon E5-2678 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 120 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 39% better in The Callisto Protocol than Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 133 vs 96 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
133
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.38/FPS
100%
Price, £
£449
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |