Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-14700F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-14700F is 1348 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900K - 217 vs 194 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - £359.99 vs £449.0
- Up to 28% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900K - £1.66 vs £2.31 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for £449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13293 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
217
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.66/FPS
100%
Price, £
£359.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £359.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13292 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 20 |
20 | Threads | 28 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |