Buy on Amazon
£58.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms Xeon E5-2665 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 1764 days newer than Xeon E5-2665.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2665
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 15% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E5-2665 - 124 vs 108 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2665 - 51 vs 115 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2665 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i3-7100
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
124
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.47/FPS
100%
Price, £
£58.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core I3-7100 3.90 GHz CPU - Black
Buy for £58.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 142 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-2665
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i3-7100
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2665 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 115 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
