Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2665 outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2665 is 419 days older than FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2665
- Performs up to 1% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-4350 - 321 vs 319 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 115 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 16 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2665 | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |