Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7100 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-7500T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7100 and the more expensive Core i5-7500T have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 1% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-7500T - 134 vs 133 FPS
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i5-7500T - £58.88 vs £158.28
- Up to 63% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-7500T - £0.44 vs £1.19 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-7100 - 35 vs 51 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
134
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.44/FPS
100%
Price, £
£58.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £58.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
Buy for £158.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100 | vs | Intel Core i5-7500T |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |