Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7500T outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7500T is 735 days older than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i5-7500T - £138.0 vs £165.42
- Up to 16% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i5-7500T - £0.73 vs £0.87 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 6 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £165.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 233 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
190
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.73/FPS
100%
Price, £
£138
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £138 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 233 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7500T | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |