Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Xeon E5-2640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2004 days newer than Xeon E5-2640.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 12% better in Lost Ark than Xeon E5-2640 - 248 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 16 vs 12 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
248
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.66/FPS
100%
Price, £
£163.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £163.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |