Buy on Amazon
£128.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Xeon E5-2640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2499 days newer than Xeon E5-2640.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 14% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2640 - 131 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-9400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
131
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.98/FPS
100%
Price, £
£128.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-9400F 2.9GHz LGA1151 9M Cache BOX CPU
Buy for £128.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12413 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-2640
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i5-9400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
