Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1386 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 28% better in F1 23 than Core i3-3220 - 196 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 67% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - £16.26 vs £49.95
- Up to 56% better value when playing F1 23 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - £0.11 vs £0.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
196
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.25/FPS
44%
Price, £
£49.95
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5776 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
153
78.06122448979592%
Value, £/FPS
£0.11/FPS
100%
Price, £
£16.26
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £16.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5775 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
48.25367647058824%
Multi-Core
1085
27.834787070292457%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |