Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-3220 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-3220 is 605 days older than the more expensive Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Performs up to 0% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G1840 - 237 vs 236 FPS
- Up to 67% cheaper than Celeron G1840 - £16.26 vs £49.95
- Up to 67% better value when playing Ready or Not than Celeron G1840 - £0.07 vs £0.21 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i3-3220 - 53 vs 55 Watts
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
237
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.07/FPS
100%
Price, £
£16.26
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £16.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1612 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
236
99.57805907172997%
Value, £/FPS
£0.21/FPS
33.333333333333336%
Price, £
£49.95
32%
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1611 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
96.19047619047619%
Multi-Core
854
78.70967741935485%
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |