Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 781 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 15% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G1840 - 519 vs 450 FPS
- Up to 9% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G1840 - £0.1 vs £0.11 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 53 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
519
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.1/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1659 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
450
86.70520231213872%
Value, £/FPS
£0.11/FPS
90.90909090909092%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1658 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
46.41544117647059%
Multi-Core
854
21.908671113391485%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |