Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms the more expensive Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1248 days older than the more expensive Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 2% better in Sea of Thieves than Athlon 3000G - 225 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 3% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - £49.95 vs £51.44
- Up to 4% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Athlon 3000G - £0.22 vs £0.23 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
225
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.22/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1669 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
221
98.22222222222223%
Value, £/FPS
£0.23/FPS
95.65217391304347%
Price, £
£51.44
97%
Buy for £51.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1669 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
87.95955882352942%
Multi-Core
1975
50.667008722421755%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Athlon |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |