Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3410 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 72% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - £16.26 vs £58.99
- Up to 68% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G6900 - £0.13 vs £0.4 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 18% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i3-3220 - 146 vs 124 FPS
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
124
84.93150684931507%
Value, £/FPS
£0.13/FPS
100%
Price, £
£16.26
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £16.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1611 minutes ago
Buy for £58.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1610 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
32.751091703056765%
Multi-Core
1085
40.24480712166172%
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |