Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4620 outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G4620 is 455 days older than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Performs up to 2% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G4900 - 245 vs 240 FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 51 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
