Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is 280 days newer than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Performs up to 7% better in Rust than Celeron G4900 - 173 vs 161 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 15 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 54 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
