Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 278 days older than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 7% better in Rust than Celeron G4900 - 173 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 64 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | EPYC |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 2 | Threads | 64 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
