Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 874 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 3% better in Counter-Strike 2 than EPYC 7551P - 303 vs 294 FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
303
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.17/FPS
100%
Price, £
£51.44
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £51.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551P | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
EPYC | Collection | Athlon |
Naples | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
180 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |