Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2650 v3 outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2650 v3 is 1303 days older than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 54 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Performs up to 18% better in FIFA 23 than Celeron G4900 - 124 vs 105 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 20 vs 2 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 2 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
