Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is 1583 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Performs up to 0% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 294 vs 293 FPS
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 15 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 15 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | No |