Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms Pentium G4620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 897 days older than Pentium G4620.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 19% better in Immortals of Aveum than Pentium G4620 - 38 vs 32 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Pentium G4620 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
757
80.87606837606837%
Multi-Core
1599
89.03118040089086%
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i3 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
