Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 2317 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 15% better in Valheim than Celeron G3900 - 220 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i9-12900 - £128.82 vs £391.44
- Up to 62% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-12900 - £0.67 vs £1.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
220
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.78/FPS
37.64044943820225%
Price, £
£391.44
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for £391.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
191
86.81818181818181%
Value, £/FPS
£0.67/FPS
100%
Price, £
£128.82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £128.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
23.49373230893651%
Multi-Core
992
7.605029132168046%
Intel Core i9-12900 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |