Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 1144 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 51 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 14% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron G3900 - 427 vs 376 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £356.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 301 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
34.83213429256595%
Multi-Core
992
12.462311557788945%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |