Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 1225 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 37% better in Starfield than Celeron G3900 - 63 vs 46 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £300 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75404 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
34.35836782968658%
Multi-Core
992
12.318390661865143%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |