Buy on Amazon
£340
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $488
Availability
MSRP in USD: $488
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 264 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Ryzen 7 2700X - 136 vs 129 FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Up to 99% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - £3.85 vs £340.0
- Up to 99% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i9-9900KF - £0.03 vs £2.5 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Intel Core i9-9900KF processor (16M cache, up to 5.00 GHz)
Buy for £340 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 142 minutes ago
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
129
94%
Value, £/FPS
£0.03/FPS
100%
Price, £
£3.85
100%
Value Winner
Sweeaau 4-pin Floppy Male Power Connector To 15-pin Female Power Cable Adapter Converter Ryzen 7 2700x
Buy for £3.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 142 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i9-9900KF
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.