Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 1703 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 23% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Celeron G3900 - 220 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
220
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.08/FPS
100%
Price, £
£236.81
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £236.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12503 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |