Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 435 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 18% better in War Thunder than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 196 vs 166 FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - £315.0 vs £428.88
- Up to 13% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-9900K - £1.9 vs £2.19 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900K - 24 vs 16 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
196
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.19/FPS
86%
Price, £
£428.88
73%
FPS Winner
Buy for £428.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 215 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
166
84%
Value, £/FPS
£1.9/FPS
100%
Price, £
£315
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £315 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |