Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 2511 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 21% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron G1840 - 452 vs 373 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £228.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75126 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
23.261169967756796%
Multi-Core
854
9.311961618144151%
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |