Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-11900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-11900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-11900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - £237.38 vs £280.13
- Up to 10% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-13600K - £1.22 vs £1.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 6% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-11900F - 206 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
194
94%
Value, £/FPS
£1.22/FPS
100%
Price, £
£237.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £237.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8573 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
206
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.36/FPS
89%
Price, £
£280.13
84%
FPS Winner
Buy for £280.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8573 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 14 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |