Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-8700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-8700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 1730 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-8700.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-8700 - 215 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8700 - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-8700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - £224.88 vs £280.13
- Up to 8% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-13600K - £1.19 vs £1.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
215
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.3/FPS
91%
Price, £
£280.13
80%
FPS Winner
Buy for £280.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15430 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
FPS
189
87%
Value, £/FPS
£1.19/FPS
100%
Price, £
£224.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £224.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15431 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | Intel Core i7-8700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |