Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 895 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 6% better in Death Stranding than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 237 vs 224 FPS
- Up to 48% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £228.97 vs £437.44
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 24 vs 16 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for £228.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75198 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
224
94.51476793248945%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
£437.44
52%
Buy for £437.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
58.68263473053892%
Multi-Core
7454
81.2779413368226%
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |