Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i9-11900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-11900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 945 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-11900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - £218.66 vs £496.14
- Up to 52% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i9-14900KF - £1.52 vs £3.14 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 10% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i9-11900F - 158 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 32 vs 16 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
144
91%
Value, £/FPS
£1.52/FPS
100%
Price, £
£218.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £218.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
158
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.14/FPS
48%
Price, £
£496.14
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for £496.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |