Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2797 days newer than Pentium G645T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 22% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Pentium G645T - 147 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645T - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
147
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.72/FPS
100%
Price, £
£399.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6188 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Single-Core
355
21.181384248210026%
Multi-Core
606
7.19202468549727%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Pentium G645T |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Pentium |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |