Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 12% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i5-4690 - 82 vs 73 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - £68.88 vs £243.05
- Up to 68% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i9-10900F - £0.94 vs £2.96 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
82
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.96/FPS
31%
Price, £
£243.05
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for £243.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Buy for £68.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i5-4690 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |