Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800X is 1893 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Up to 68% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3800X - £68.88 vs £215.0
- Up to 65% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 7 3800X - £0.41 vs £1.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 20% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800X - 84 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
- Performs up to 8% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-4690 - 182 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 16 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
169
92%
Value, £/FPS
£0.41/FPS
100%
Price, £
£68.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £68.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 234 minutes ago
Buy for £215 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 234 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |