Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820HQ outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7820HQ is 240 days older than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820HQ
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7820HQ - 16 vs 8 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
201
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.81/FPS
100%
Price, £
£163.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £163.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7820HQ | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |