Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms Core i7-620M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 2553 days newer than Core i7-620M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-7100 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 4% better in Stray than Core i7-620M - 183 vs 176 FPS
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
183
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.32/FPS
100%
Price, £
£58.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £58.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-620M | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Arrandale | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |