Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1840 outperforms Core i7-620M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1840 is 1575 days newer than Core i7-620M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Celeron G1840 - 35 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 9% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-620M - 25 vs 23 FPS
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
25
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-620M | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Arrandale | Codename | Haswell |
Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |