Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G1840 outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G1840 is 367 days newer than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 6% cheaper than FX-6350 - £49.95 vs £52.95
- Up to 6% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-6350 - £0.33 vs £0.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 6 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
152
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.33/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15327 minutes ago
Buy for £52.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15327 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |