Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3243 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 16% better in Ready or Not than Core i7-3770K - 282 vs 243 FPS
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - £132.79 vs £225.0
- Up to 49% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i7-3770K - £0.47 vs £0.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 12 vs 8 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for £225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10265 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
282
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.47/FPS
100%
Price, £
£132.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £132.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10266 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |