Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - £225.0 vs £246.78
- Up to 3% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-10900F - £1.74 vs £1.79 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 7% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-3770K - 138 vs 129 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 20 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
129
93%
Value, £/FPS
£1.74/FPS
100%
Price, £
£225
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13295 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
138
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.79/FPS
97%
Price, £
£246.78
91%
FPS Winner
Buy for £246.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13296 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |