Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 1808 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 4% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core i7-3770K - 201 vs 194 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - £220.6 vs £225.0
- Up to 5% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i7-3770K - £1.1 vs £1.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 12 vs 8 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12996 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
201
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.1/FPS
100%
Price, £
£220.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £220.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12784 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |