Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 2463 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - £220.6 vs £359.99
- Up to 24% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i7-14700F - £1.31 vs £1.73 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 24% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen 5 1600 - 208 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 28 vs 12 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
168
80%
Value, £/FPS
£1.31/FPS
100%
Price, £
£220.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £220.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18810 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
208
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.73/FPS
75%
Price, £
£359.99
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for £359.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19021 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 20 |
12 | Threads | 28 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |