Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF and the cheaper Core i5-11400F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - £132.79 vs £238.88
- Up to 39% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i9-11900KF - £1.53 vs £2.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 9% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i5-11400F - 95 vs 87 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 16 vs 12 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
87
91%
Value, £/FPS
£1.53/FPS
100%
Price, £
£132.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £132.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3546 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
95
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.51/FPS
60%
Price, £
£238.88
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for £238.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3546 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |