Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2738 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 6% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-2700K - 167 vs 157 FPS
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i7-2700K - £108.88 vs £159.86
- Up to 36% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-2700K - £0.65 vs £1.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-2700K - 65 vs 95 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for £159.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
167
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.65/FPS
100%
Price, £
£108.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £108.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2700K | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Oct 24th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |