Buy on Amazon
£77.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2633 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - £77.99 vs £108.88
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i7-2700K - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-2700K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core I7-2700K I7 2700K 3.5 GHz Quad-Core CPU Processor 8M 95W LGA 1155
Buy for £77.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74112 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-9400F 2.9GHz LGA1151 9M Cache BOX CPU
Buy for £108.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-2700K
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Core i5-9400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-2700K
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Single-Core
664
48.185776487663276%
Multi-Core
2264
46.8349193214729%
Intel Core i7-2700K | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 24th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
