Buy on Amazon
£128.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $55
Availability
MSRP in USD: $55
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 200GE is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 124 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Escape From Tarkov than Athlon 200GE - 207 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - £86.0 vs £128.88
- Up to 29% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i5-9400F - £0.44 vs £0.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i5-9400F 2.9GHz LGA1151 9M Cache BOX CPU
Buy for £128.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16654 minutes ago
AMD Athlon 200GE - 3.2 GHz - 2 Cores - 4 Threads - 4 MB Cache Memory - Socket AM4 - OEM (YD200GC6M2OFB)
Buy for £86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16653 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-9400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Athlon 200GE
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Athlon |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
