Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 200GE is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 392 days older than the cheaper Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Up to 76% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - £74.27 vs £315.0
- Up to 76% better value when playing Valheim than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - £0.38 vs £1.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Valheim than Athlon 200GE - 198 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 24 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
194
97%
Value, £/FPS
£0.38/FPS
100%
Price, £
£74.27
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £74.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
198
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.59/FPS
23%
Price, £
£315
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for £315 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Athlon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |