Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 200GE is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 124 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - £86.0 vs £138.0
- Up to 30% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-9400F - £0.5 vs £0.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 13% better in Rust than Athlon 200GE - 194 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 6 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for £86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
Buy for £138 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i5 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |