Buy on Amazon
£86
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $55
Availability
MSRP in USD: $55
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 200GE is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 922 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - £86.0 vs £100.68
- Up to 5% better value when playing New World than Core i3-10105 - £0.83 vs £0.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 12% better in New World than Athlon 200GE - 116 vs 104 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 8 vs 4 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
AMD Athlon 200GE - 3.2 GHz - 2 Cores - 4 Threads - 4 MB Cache Memory - Socket AM4 - OEM (YD200GC6M2OFB)
Buy for £86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15503 minutes ago
Core i3-10105
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
116
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.87/FPS
95%
Price, £
£100.68
85%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i3-10105
Buy for £100.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15503 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Athlon 200GE
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Core i3-10105
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Athlon | Collection | Core i3 |
| Raven Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
